Pembentukan Portofolio Optimal dengan Menggunakan Mean Absolute Deviation dan Conditional Mean Variance

Authors

  • Eka Nur Vanti UIN Sunan Kalijaga
  • Epha Diana Supandi UIN Sunan Kalijaga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/fourier.2020.91.25-34

Keywords:

Autoregressive, Conditional Mean Variance, GARCH, Mean Absolute Deviation, Portfolio, Sortino index

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas tentang pembentukan portofolio optimal menggunakan model Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) dan model Conditional Mean Variance (CMV). Pada model MAD risiko portofolio diukur menggunakan rata–rata deviasi standar sehingga portofolio optimal dapat diperoleh dengan menggunakan pemrograman linear. Sedangkan portofolio model CMV, rata–rata return diestimasi menggunakan model Autoregressive (AR) dan risiko (variansi) diestimasi menggunakan model GARCH. Selanjutnya kedua model portofolio diterapkan dalam membentuk portofolio optimal pada saham–saham yang terdaftar dalam Indeks Saham Syariah Indonesia (ISSI) periode 4 Juli 2016 sampai 4 Juli 2018. Kinerja kedua portofolio dianalisis menggunakan indeks Sortino. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa kinerja portofolio model CMV lebih baik dibandingkan model portofolio MAD.

[This study discusses the formation of optimal portfolios using the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) model and the Conditional Mean Variance (CMV) model. The MAD portfolio model measures portfolio risk by using average standard deviations so that optimal portfolios solved by using linear programming. Meanwhile the CMV portfolio model, the average return estimated by using the Autoregressive (AR) model and the risk (variance) estimated by using the GARCH model. Furthermore, both portfolio models applied in forming optimal portfolios for stocks listed in the Indonesian Syariah Stock Index (ISSI) for the period 4 July 2016 to 4 July 2018. The performance of both portfolios analyzed by using the Sortino index. The results show that the portfolio performance of the CMV model is better than MAD portfolio model.]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ashraf Chaudhry, Helen L. Johnson. 2008. The Efficacy of the Sortino Ratio and Other Benchmarked Performance Measures under Skewed Return Distributions. Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 32 (3).
[2] Dedi Rosadi. 2006. Pengantar Analisa Runtun Waktu. Yogyakarta: FMIPA Universitas Gajah Mada.
[3] Hanene Salah, Ali Gannoun, Mathieu Ribatet. 2016. Conditional Mean-Variance and Mean-Semivariance models in portfolio optimization. Quantitative Finance. HAL Id : hal-01404752.
[4] Holt, M. T., and S. V. Aradhyula. 1989. Price Risk in Supply Equations: An Application of GARCH Time-Series Models to the U.S. Broiler Market. Proceedings of the NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management. Chicago, IL.
[5] Husnan, S.. 2008. Manajemen Keuangan Teori dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
[6] Jogiyanto. 2000. Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi. 2nd edition. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
[7] Konno, H., Yamazaki, H. 1991. Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to Tokyo stock market. Management Science. Vol 37(5), pp 519 – 531.
[8] Markowitz, H. 1952. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance. Vol 7(1), pp 77 – 91.
[9] Pegah Kolbadi, Hamed Ahmadinia. 2011. Examining Sharp, Sortino and Sterling Ratios in Portfolio Management, Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Business and Management. Vol 6 (4). Pp: 222 – 236.
[10] Satheesh V. Aradhyula and Matthew T. HoltG. 1988. GARCH Time-Series Models: An Application to Retail Livestock Prices. CARD Working Papers. 77. Iowa State University
[11] Sortino F, Van der Meer R. 1991. Downside risk, Journal of Portfolio Management. Vol 17 (2), pp 27 – 31.
[12] Wirdasari, D., 2009. Metode Simpleks dalam Program Linier. SAINTIKOM, 6(1), pp. 276-285.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

How to Cite

Vanti, E. N., & Supandi, E. D. (2020). Pembentukan Portofolio Optimal dengan Menggunakan Mean Absolute Deviation dan Conditional Mean Variance. Jurnal Fourier, 9(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.14421/fourier.2020.91.25-34

Issue

Section

Articles